We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation
and member institutions
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

Title: Design and Analysis of the NIPS 2016 Review Process

Abstract: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) is a top-tier annual conference in machine learning. The 2016 edition of the conference comprised more than 2,400 paper submissions, 3,000 reviewers, and 8,000 attendees, representing a growth of nearly 40% in terms of submissions, 96% in terms of reviewers, and over 100% in terms of attendees as compared to the previous year. In this report, we analyze several aspects of the data collected during the review process, including an experiment investigating the efficacy of collecting ordinal rankings from reviewers (vs. usual scores aka cardinal rankings). Our goal is to check the soundness of the review process we implemented and, in going so, provide insights that may be useful in the design of the review process of subsequent conferences. We introduce a number of metrics that could be used for monitoring improvements when new ideas are introduced.
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Learning (cs.LG); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1708.09794 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:1708.09794v1 [cs.DL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Nihar Shah [view email]
[v1] Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:09:33 GMT (6485kb,D)